CQ COULD TOP IQ
For decades we have heard about IQ, the Intelligence Quotient that
supposedly measures intelligence. Now there is a new kid on the
block, the CQ, or Change Quotient, measuring the ability to adapt to
change in a changing world.
It is no secret that our institutions did not and still do not,
advocate such an outlook. To do so, is contrary to definition:
"Institution: an established law, custom, practice or system -- an
organization having a social, educational or religious purpose." To
advocate change in such institutions would have been, and still is,
heresy (any opinion opposed to official or established views). Such
thoughts are radical, also by definition -- "favoring fundamental or
extreme change". Over the centuries the conservative outlook has
generally served, a useful purpose. However, when radical change
hits a culture, such change destroys the culture or society
challenged.
As the world globalizes -- itself a radical and totally new change
-- old institutions have no knowledge of which direction to follow,
what strategy to use or even where to appeal for guidance. The
guides are lost, the guided disillusioned, angry, bitter and afraid.
Where are the calm and confident in a storm of chaos? Certainly not
among the leaders of the status quo, in the institutions or societies
that advocated continually homage to the establishment. Outside
their parish, they are but strangers in a strange land entering new
forests (ironically, the word parish, in Greek, paroikos, means
"stranger").
In previous columns I have spoken about the "knowledge navigators",
often young computer "hackers" who seize the new technology of the
day and ride it into the unknown. This has happened before. At the
end, perhaps even signalling the end, of the Dark Ages were the bold,
daring early sailors in the days of "Henry the Navigator" of
Portugal. King Henry showed his navy how, by using the astralabe,
the fore-runner to the sextant, up to then only used in monasteries
for studying and measuring the angles of the sun and stars, enable
ships to navigate uncharted seas.
Today's new knowledge navigators are worth listening to. Their's is a
vision of hope, accomplishment, inner satisfaction and success. Not
one of dispair, terror, indecision and poverty. They search for the
unknown because they are bored with the known and they dream of the
new adventures and riches that fall to the risk takers early in any
new age.
What does this have to do with CQ, the Change Quotient? The new
navigators, whether for genetic reasons or simply self-motivation,
have high ratings on the yet undrawn CQ chart of tomorrow. They are
going where no man has gone before. Sailing caravels of silicon and
gallium arsenide, today's Magellans and da Gammas are actually seeing
into the unknown, although they may be the first to admit they
haven't yet confirmed in which direction they are travelling. Sound
somewhat Columbian?
How do you identify such silicon sailors, since they wear no uniform
a navy would recognize? By their inability to be taught. By their
ability to learn. They are not the least bit interested in the
known, that and the way it is presented is boring. They want to
learn the unknown. You may also notice their confidence, assurance
and optimism. And their tolerance of those who don't understand what
they are seeking. Was it ever thus.
* * *
<
previous |
chapter index |
next >
back to Main Chapter Listing
back to Home Page