WAR TECHNOLOGY -- BOWS VS. LASERS
The war in the Persian Gulf wasn't between the Allied Coalition and
Iraq but between antiquated military technology and the technology of
the new age. This is probably the first time there has been so
devastating a difference since that day, not so long ago, when men
with bows and arrows first faced men with rifles. Both of these
historic events were unfair contests. Today technology has the power
to change whole game plans, to alter the rules and to up or downgrade
the players.
In war, as in business, those with the best information usually win.
The best information provides the best instruments of war. In fact
the Coalition/Iraq war was not dissimilar to the North America
"business war" with Japan and other Asian countries. One side
gathers more information and utilizes it in a more superior fashion
while on the other side, in the board rooms of the major national
companies, still stuck in obsolete information gathering and
dissemination techniques, wonders what has hit them.
Isn't it interesting that the U.S. spends well over half its national
R&D budget for the military and wins. Japan spends more than half
its R&D budget for the civilian consumer market and wins. So the
results are not surprising.
Communications won this war because the Coalition knew what was going
on. Iraq at times didn't even know where the war was!
As with any product the most advanced technology (as pointed out by
author and visionary, Arthur C. Clarke -- the movie 2001, 2010, and
more than 50 books) is indistinguishable from magic. The Iraqis, in
many cases, also didn't even know what hit them. They should have
phoned Detroit. GM, Ford and Chrysler know how it feels.
The first time I knew the Allies would win quickly was when I studied
their new use of radar reflection as a direct missile highway to the
enemy's radar base. Here's the way it works. The U.S. sends out
slow fighters they want to get picked up by radar. This plane is
detected by Iraqi radar at the radar's maximum effective distance.
The slow fighter turns away, but immediately behind him filling his
radar slot, follows a faster, more sophisticated fighter whose
instrumentation knows when they are locked into enemy's radar. The
enemy thinks it is playing with an older plane and may not notice the
profile has changed slightly (Much like what happened when Korean
Airlines Flight #007 was shot down by the U.S.S.R., over the Kurile
Islands a few years ago when the airliner replaced a U.S. tanker
plane with a similar profile, on the Russian radar screens).
The new age fighter then fires its missiles that track the returning
radar signal back to the source of emission thus blowing up the radar
site that originated the initial sighting. Each radar site can only
do this once. After other radar bases hear the results operating
staff become reluctant to even try it.
This, to my knowledge, is the first time this particular technique
has been used since radar was perfected. Futurist Arthur C. Clarke
was involved in developing original radar during World War II.
Besides the heavy air bombardment, supported by the largest floating
guns in any world navy, the Allies were able to use portions of the
electromagnetic spectrum to do what again what has never been done
before in wartime: see beneath the desert. During the early days of
the war, when temperatures were cool and even cold (as one who
visited the Sahara earlier this year I can confirm near-freezing
desert temperatures at night). During these cold temperatures the
buried Iraqi tanks and crews could remain relatively well hidden from
normal human vision.
However, as desert daytime temperatures heated up mid-to-late
February something else started to happen. Strong daytime sun rays
penetrated the sand down to the buried tanks which absorbed the sun's
infrared rays. As the desert surface cooled rapidly in the evening,
infrared detectors (from both satellite and patrolling aircraft)
showed a distinct outline of radiating infrared waves sent back from
the warmed up tanks. The picture is extremely clear. Bombing aircraft were able to fly over, or even direct from a distance, a whole
battery of military equipment that pinpointed the underground outline
of these tanks and dropped their military missiles to make almost
assured direct hits on the tanks and troops at that location. Tank
commanders had limited choice. They could stay and get bombed while
underground or they could come out and be strafed on the surface by
pilots who could clearly see them but which they could not see,
although they certainly could hear them overhead. In such chaotic
situations death comes on swift wings.
The Coalition Forces, mainly the U.S. Stealth bombers, still didn't
use all their tricks. Two squadrons of Stealth aircraft flying at
mach II or III over Bagdad could have levelled the city without
firing a shot or dropping one bomb - just by the concentrated shock
waves created by their supersonic speed. It would have been the
modern version of Joshua, and Gabriel with his horn - both of whose
biblical characters carry big weight in the Moslem Koran. The same
bombers could have diverted the Tigris and Euphratea rivers causing
considerable chaos along the downstream route. U.S. satellites can
provide considerable topographical information - in effect telling
them how to move rivers - and much more. DARPA (Defense Army
Research Projects Agency) is the U.S. military research agency that
has been working on this, and many other military projects. They are
largely responsible for the development of various techniques and
equipment used in the Gulf War. DARPA is still open for business
because one day's laser beams are tomorrow's arrows. Just as I was
finishing this column another strange report flowed in via satellite
from an electronic magazine. The Bagdad TV and radio stations went
off the air an hour prior to the Coalition dropping the first bomb?
Sounds like the Coalition used EMP, dispatched an Electro Magnetic
Pulse to "fry" the electronic innards of the Bagdad TV station and
prevent it from sending out any information seconds after the "new"
game commenced.
More information:
Victor H. Rice, Deputy Director,
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)
1400 Wilson Blvd.,
Arlington, VA 22204-2308. Phone: 202/694-5469.
* * *
<
previous |
chapter index |
next >
back to Main Chapter Listing
back to Home Page